Key result
This review outlines various biochemical, invasive, and non-invasive methods for assessing endothelial function, highlighting their clinical relevance and the effects of treatments on endothelial dysfunction.
This review summarizes the mechanisms, assessment methods, and therapeutic modulation of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease.
Endothelial function assessment remains exploratory; leaves open standardized clinical integration pending prospective validation.
Endothelial dysfunction is a characteristic aspect of most of the conditions associated with atherosclerosis and is commonly found as an early feature in atherothrombotic vascular disease. An appreciation of the underlying mechanisms of endothelial function, as well as dysfunction, is essential as this has critical influence on the different methods in the assessment of endothelial function and effects of various treatments on its quantification. Furthermore, endothelial dysfunction is recognised as a type of 'target organ damage' in common cardiovascular conditions (e.g., hypertension) and the area is of increasing interest for new drug development, as therapies that modulate the endothelium will have added advantages; thus, for the development of new/experimental drugs, an awareness of ways to assess the endothelium is necessary. In this review, an overview of different methods including biochemical markers, and invasive and non-invasive tools, to determine endothelial function is presented as well as their clinical relevance. Furthermore, the effects of various treatments on endothelial dysfunction and their underlying mechanisms are elucidated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felmeden et al. (2005) conducted a review in Endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial function assessment methods was evaluated. This review outlines various biochemical, invasive, and non-invasive methods for assessing endothelial function, highlighting their clinical relevance and the effects of treatments on endothelial dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: