Basal readers dominate reading instruction in most classrooms across the country. In fact, considering the central role of basal readers in the classroom, the selection of a basal reader represents the selection of a reading curriculum in most American schools. And, because textbook companies publish what school districts and states choose to buy, textbook selection directly influences the quality of basal readers. Operating properly, textbook selection should contribute to the improvement of reading instruction. However, major weaknesses are evident in the process of basal reader selection by states and school districts: Decisions on basal reader selection are often based on peripheral or insignificant criteria; members of selection committees frequently are handicapped by lack of time, training, and direction; selection decisions often do not reflect philosophies about the teaching of reading; publishers and influential committee members often wield disproportionate power to influence decisions; and, statewide selection, conducted in 22 states, yields few benefits to justify the additional investment of money and time. For basal reader selection to operate as it should, major changes are needed in assumptions regarding the adoption process, selection of reviewers, establishment of criteria, and in procedures for evaluating materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farr et al. (1987) studied this question.