PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1994American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology209 citations

Potential Cultural Bias in Training Parents as Conversational Partners With Their Children Who Have Delays in Language Development

View Full Paper
AKAnne Van Kleeck

Key Points

  • This article aims to identify cultural biases in training parents to support their children with language delays.
  • Analysis of existing research on parent-child interactions focusing on nondominant cultural groups.
  • Exploration of cultural assumptions related to language socialization and parent-child dynamics.
  • Examination of aspects such as social organization, value of talk, status in interaction, intentionality beliefs, and language teaching beliefs.
  • Identified cultural biases in language intervention programs primarily targeting white, middle-class families.
  • Highlighted the need for culturally-relative approaches in language development interventions.
  • Proposed clinical implications based on the understanding of diverse cultural interactions and values.

Abstract

This article explores the potential cultural biases in language intervention approaches that train parents to interact with their children who have language delays in ways that will promote language development. The goals of such programs are solidly grounded in research on parent-child interaction. However, these studies have focused almost exclusively on white, middle-class families. Therefore, the goals reflect underlying values and beliefs that are not shared by all cultural groups. This article highlights the cultural assumptions that underlie these programs by considering research on language socialization in a variety of nondominant American and non-American cultures and social groups. Culturally relativevalues, beliefs, and practices underlying parentchild interaction are explored in the areas of (1) aspects of social organization related to interaction, (2) the value of talk, (3) how status is handled in interaction, (4) beliefs about intentionality, and (5) beliefs about teaching language to children. Finally, clinical implications are explored.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anne Van Kleeck (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2225aeb5b715f1d04ea66ehttps://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0301.67
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper