OBJECTIVE: The current systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the prevalence of central precocious puberty (CPP) throughout the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out following the principles outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA, 2020). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and WANFANG databases were searched from January 1, 2019, to March 30, 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: (1) children and adolescents ≤ 15 years; (2) studies with the outcome of frequency of central precocious puberty, measured prior to and throughout the COVID-19 pandemic; (3) a novel CPP diagnosis was created depending on all of the following criteria: girls with a chronological age < 8 years and boys with a chronological age < 9 years at the onset of symptoms, basal luteinizing hormone (LH) levels > 0.3 UI/L, and/or GnRH-stimulated peak LH levels > 5 IU/L. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: statistic. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 17 studies. In contrast to the same period prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the occurrence of CPP elevated (OR = 2.57; 95% CI, 1.85-3.56). Moreover, body mass index standard deviation score (BMI SDS) differences between CPP patients prior to COVID-19 and throughout the pandemic follow-up was 0.12 (95% CI - 0.01 to 0.25 P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Overall, CPP frequency significantly elevated throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the restricted number of cohort investigations in this meta-analysis, additional research may be conducted on larger groups of children in order to establish a correlation between the observed rise in precocious puberty and specific pathogenic factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: