Key result
Coronary microvascular dysfunction in T2D is linked to ~58% higher cognitive decline and elevated stroke risk.
Why the study?
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with microvascular complications that may contribute to cardiovascular and neurological morbidity, prompting evaluation of how coronary microvascular dysfunction relates to stroke risk and cognitive decline.
Is coronary microvascular dysfunction associated with increased stroke risk and cognitive decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cross-Sectional (n=255)
No
Is coronary microvascular dysfunction associated with increased stroke risk and cognitive decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes is significantly associated with a higher prevalence of cognitive decline, elevated stroke risk, and worse metabolic profiles.
Does not support practice change in type 2 diabetes; leaves open microvascular dysfunction as a modifiable risk factor for cognitive and stroke outcomes.
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with microvascular complications that may contribute to both cardiovascular and neurological morbidity. Objective: To evaluate the association of coronary microvascular dysfunction with stroke risk, cognitive decline, and selected hematologic/metabolic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without major vessel occlusion. Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Cardiology, Jinnah International Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan, from May 2025 to November 2025. A total of 255 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was assessed through clinical evaluation and available cardiovascular investigations in patients without significant epicardial coronary artery obstruction. Results: The mean age of the participants was 54.7 ± 10.9 years, and 146 (57.3%) were male. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was identified in 112 (43.9%) patients. Cognitive decline was significantly more frequent among patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction than those without it (46.4% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.006). Elevated stroke risk was also higher in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (43.8% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.001). Patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction had longer diabetes duration (10.1 ± 4.3 vs. 7.4 ± 3.6 years, p = 0.001), higher glycosylated hemoglobin levels (8.9 ± 1.6% vs. 7.8 ± 1.4%, p = 0.001), higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (142.1 ± 27.5 vs. 128.4 ± 28.7 mg/dL, p = 0.004), and greater frequencies of hypertension (63.4% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.012) and dyslipidemia (55.4% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.028). Conclusion: Coronary microvascular dysfunction was common among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and was significantly associated with cognitive decline, elevated stroke risk, and adverse metabolic profiles. Early identification of microvascular dysfunction may improve vascular risk stratification and guide preventive strategies in diabetic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imran et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=255). Coronary microvascular dysfunction vs. No coronary microvascular dysfunction was evaluated on Cognitive decline (p=0.006). Coronary microvascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes was associated with higher rates of cognitive decline (46.4% vs 29.4%, p=0.006) and elevated stroke risk (43.8% vs 23.1%, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: