Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A convenient measure of fecundability is time (number of menstrual cycles) required to achieve pregnancy. Couples attempting pregnancy are heterogeneous in their per-cycle probability of success. If success probabilities vary among couples according to a beta distribution, then cycles to pregnancy will have a beta-geometric distribution. Under this model, the inverse of the cycle-specific conception rate is a linear function of time. Data on cycles to pregnancy can be used to estimate the beta parameters by maximum likelihood in a straightforward manner with a package such as GLIM. The likelihood ratio test can thus be employed in studies of exposures that may impair fecundability. Covariates are incorporated in a natural way. The model is illustrated by applying it to data on cycles to pregnancy in smokers and nonsmokers, with adjustment for covariates. For a cross-sectional study, when length-biased sampling is taken into account, the pre-interview attempt time is shown to follow a beta-geometric distribution, so that the same methods of analysis can be applied even though all of the available data are right-censored. For a cohort followed prospectively, there will be some couples enrolled whose fecundability is effectively 0, and for such applications, the beta could be considered to be contaminated by a distribution degenerate at 0. The mixing parameter (proportion sterile) can be estimated by application of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. This, too, can be carried out using GLIM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinberg et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: