Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article we investigate the large-sample/small-sample approach to the one-sample test for a mean when the variance is unknown, using the probability of a Type I error as the criterion of interest. We show that in most cases using a t-test (t critical value) provides a more robust test than does using the z-test (standard normal critical value). The only case in which z has some advantage is when using a small sample from a parent population with extremely high kurtosis or with skewness in the direction of the rejection region tail. The implications for teaching the large-sample/small-sample approach in introductory statistics classes are discussed in light of these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhiel et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: