This paper describes how a study using institutional ethnography (IE) was used as a decolonizing method of inquiry in a rural Indigenous community in Canada. IE honors lived experience, reveals institutional and colonial practices, provides clear empirical evidence, and can offer clear recommendations that can benefit Indigenous communities. At the heart of decolonizing research is the task of shifting whose knowledge is privileged – from those with power (often researchers) to those who are being researched (those subject to the effects of colonization). To highlight how IE can be used as a decolonizing method of inquiry, the authors of this paper (a) point out common pitfalls of academic research and knowledge translation (KT) practices in Indigenous health; (b) highlight decolonizing research principles and how IE can be a decolonizing method of inquiry; and (c) share an example to illustrate how IE was used in a decolonizing health study in a First Nations community context. This paper also outlines critiques of mainstream research and KT practices, highlights principles for conducting research with Indigenous people in Canada, and further discusses how IE is well positioned to facilitate both decolonizing research and strategic KT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ninomiya et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: