Key result
An autoencoder-based framework for extrasystole detection achieved 93% sensitivity and 0.08 false positives per hour, while reducing root mean squared error to 31% in PVC and 73% in PAC.
Why the study?
Heart rate variability features extracted from R-R interval data fluctuate during arrhythmia, requiring ectopic data from extrasystoles like PVC and PAC to be appropriately modified before analysis.
Does an autoencoder-based framework improve the detection and modification of ectopic RRIs for accurate heart rate variability analysis?
Does an autoencoder-based framework improve the detection and modification of ectopic RRIs for accurate heart rate variability analysis?
An autoencoder-based framework effectively detects and modifies ectopic RRIs caused by PVCs and PACs, improving the accuracy of heart rate variability analysis.
May aid accurate HRV analysis via ectopic correction; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Heart rate variability, which is the fluctuation of the R-R interval (RRI) in electrocardiograms (ECG), has been widely adopted for autonomous evaluation. Since the HRV features that are extracted from RRI data easily fluctuate when arrhythmia occurs, RRI data with arrhythmia need to be modified appropriately before HRV analysis. In this study, we consider two types of extrasystoles-premature ventricular contraction (PVC) and premature atrial contraction (PAC)-which are types of extrasystoles that occur every day, even in healthy persons who have no cardiovascular diseases. A unified framework for ectopic RRI detection and a modification algorithm that utilizes an autoencoder (AE) type of neural network is proposed. The proposed framework consists of extrasystole occurrence detection from the RRI data and modification, whose targets are PVC and PAC. The RRI data are monitored by means of the AE in real time in the detection phase, and a denoising autoencoder (DAE) modifies the ectopic RRI caused by the detected extrasystole. These are referred to as AE-based extrasystole detection (AED) and DAE-based extrasystole modification (DAEM), respectively. The proposed framework was applied to real RRI data with PVC and PAC. The result showed that AED achieved a sensitivity of 93% and a false positive rate of 0.08 times per hour. The root mean squared error of the modified RRI decreased to 31% in PVC and 73% in PAC from the original RRI data by DAEM. In addition, the proposed framework was validated through application to a clinical epileptic seizure problem, which showed that it correctly suppressed the false positives caused by PVC. Thus, the proposed framework can contribute to realizing accurate HRV-based health monitoring and medical sensing systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujiwara et al. (2021) studied Extrasystoles (premature ventricular contraction and premature atrial contraction). Autoencoder-based extrasystole detection and modification framework vs. Original RRI data was evaluated on Extrasystole detection sensitivity, false positive rate, and root mean squared error of modified RRI. An autoencoder-based framework for extrasystole detection achieved 93% sensitivity and 0.08 false positives per hour, while reducing root mean squared error to 31% in PVC and 73% in PAC.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: