Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives This study aimed to (i) establish the concurrent validity and intra-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit for monitoring soccer technical actions, (ii) quantify the within-microcycle inter-positional differences in the technical actions of professional soccer training, and (iii) determine the influence of drill category on the technical actions of professional soccer training.Methods Twenty-one professional soccer players’ technical performance data (ball touches, releases, ball touches per minute, releases per minute), collected during training sessions throughout twenty-four weekly microcycles, were analysed using general linear modelling.Results The inertial measurement unit exhibited good concurrent validity (PA = 95.1% – 100.0%) and intra-unit reliability (PA = 95.9% – 96.9%, CV = 1.4% – 2.9%) when compared with retrospective video analyses. The most ball touches (X‾ = 218.0) and releases (X‾ = 110.8) were observed on MD – 1, with MD – 5 eliciting the highest frequency of ball touches (X‾ = 3.8) and releases (X‾ = 1.7) per minute. Central midfielders performed the most ball touches (X‾ = 221.9), releases (X‾ = 108.3), ball touches per minute (X‾ = 3.4) and releases per minute (X‾ = 1.6). Small-sided games evoked more ball touches (X‾diff = 1.5) and releases per minute (X‾diff = 0.1) than previously reported in match-play. The fewest ball touches (X‾ = 1.2) and releases per minute (X‾ = 0.5) were observed during tactical drills.Conclusion The results of this study provide a novel understanding of the within-microcycle, inter-positional and drill category differences in the technical actions performed by professional players during training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marris et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: