Staphylococcal delta-toxin, a synthetic analogue and a fragment were studied in order to determine their structure in solution and bound in lipids. In solution, a self-association process is observed. Analytical ultracentrifuge and quasi-elastic light-scattering experiments suggest an isodesmic aggregation in the high concentration domain above 2 microM up to very large asymmetrical species. Decreasing concentrations below 2 microM of delta-toxin and the analogue allows dissociation, probably into monomers. The self-associated species are essentially alpha-helical (70%) with buried and highly immobilized Trp either at position 15 for natural delta-toxin or 16 for the analogue. At the lowest concentration studied, the alpha-helix content severely decreases down to 35% while Trp fluorescence shows that these residues are exposed to buffer. The fragment 11-26 is always monomeric and structureless. From all the data, a structural model of aggregated species is proposed with stacked antiparallel amphipathic rods. When bound to lipids, whatever their initial structure in solution, 26-residue long peptides mainly adopt an alpha-helix conformation (80%) while fragment 11-26 exhibits about 50% alpha-helix. The lipid-peptide interactions were quantitatively analysed. For fragment 11-26, a single-step mechanism fits the spectroscopic changes and defines a single monomeric bound structure. On the other hand, for the 26-residue-long analogue, multiple-step processes must occur. The data were analysed with a partition of tetramers into lipids followed by a partial dissociation. Finally, the affinity of fragment 11-26 severely decreases from micelles to fluid and gel-state bilayers. The partition coefficient of the delta-toxin analogue is higher than those of other more apolar peptides, such as melittin and alamethicin, correlating with Eisenberg's hydrophobic moments. It is therefore proposed that delta-toxin probably lies parallel to the surface, only penetrating weakly in lipids, depending on their packing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thiaudière et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: