Ubiquitous computing, mobile devices, and big data come together to give rise to a new urban paradigm being celebrated by many technology corporations and municipalities alike: the smart city. Yet, the general tenor of the current hype around smart cities is mainly about efficiency and productivity gains through automation and algorithmic analysis, and growth. What evidence is there to suggest that the smart city can provide genuine answers to a number of wicked problems humanity faces? The smart city agenda is only now starting to slowly move beyond the technology and data hype and come to terms with issues of housing affordability, digital inclusion, social justice. However, the list of challenges does not end here. Climate change already has a great impact on cities with a notable increase in adverse weather events, and some thought leaders actively seek to reconcile the smart city with the resilient city. A pertinent question to ask is whether the people-centric focus is in fact worth rethinking in order to imagine a new economy that embraces the post-anthropocentric city. With society’s current limited perspective that centres around humans, we risk to forget other living beings, the environment, and the wider ecosystem that keep us alive. Can we reconceptualise the smart city as a place where people and place meet to make a net positive contribution to the world?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcus Foth (2017) studied this question.