The trends in ESD robustness as a function of technology scaling, for feature sizes down to 0.25 /spl mu/m, have been experimentally determined using single finger nMOS transistors and full ESD protection circuits. It is shown that as feature sizes are reduced, good ESD performance can be obtained provided the negative effects of the shallower junctions are offset by the positive effects of the reduction in the effective channel lengths. Hence, processes and protection circuits with feature sizes as small as 0.25 /spl mu/m can be developed without degrading ESD robustness.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amerasekera et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: