Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a recent work, the author introduced a robust multilevel incomplete factorization algorithm using spanning trees of matrix graphs (Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Preconditioning Techniques for Large Sparse Matrix Problems in Industrial Applications, Hubert H. Humphrey Center, University of Minnesota, 1999, 251–257). Based on this idea linear and non‐linear algebraic multilevel iteration (AMLI) methods are investigated in the present paper. In both cases, the preconditioner is constructed recursively from the coarsest to finer and finer levels. The considered W ‐cycles only need diagonal solvers on all levels and additionally evaluate a second‐degree matrix polynomial (linear case), or, perform ν inner GCG‐type iterations (non‐linear case) on every other level. This involves the same type of preconditioner for the corresponding Schur complement. The non‐linear variant has the additional benefit of being free from any method parameters to be estimated. Based on the same type of approximation property similar convergence rates are obtained for linear and non‐linear AMLI, even for a very small number ν of inner iterations, e.g. ν =2,3. The presented methods are robust with respect to anisotropy and discontinuities in the coefficients of the PDEs and can also be applied to unstructured‐grid problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johannes Kraus (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: