Key result
Cryo-EM structure at 3.24-Å resolution reveals that Arpin binds to the Arp3 site of the Arp2/3 complex, using sequence differences within its C-helix to inhibit rather than activate the complex.
Why the study?
The Arp2/3 complex inhibitor Arpin controls directional persistence of cell migration by interrupting a Rac-WAVE-Arp2/3 feedback loop, but its mechanism of inhibition is unknown.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study reveals the structural basis by which Arpin inhibits the Arp2/3 complex, contrasting with the activation mechanism of WASP-family nucleation-promoting factors.
Positive feedback loops involving signaling and actin assembly factors mediate the formation and remodeling of branched actin networks in processes ranging from cell and organelle motility to mechanosensation. The Arp2/3 complex inhibitor Arpin controls the directional persistence of cell migration by interrupting a feedback loop involving Rac-WAVE-Arp2/3 complex, but Arpin’s mechanism of inhibition is unknown. Here, we describe the cryo-EM structure of Arpin bound to Arp2/3 complex at 3.24-Å resolution. Unexpectedly, Arpin binds Arp2/3 complex similarly to WASP-family nucleation-promoting factors (NPFs) that activate the complex. However, whereas NPFs bind to two sites on Arp2/3 complex, on Arp2-ArpC1 and Arp3, Arpin only binds to the site on Arp3. Like NPFs, Arpin has a C-helix that binds at the barbed end of Arp3. Mutagenesis studies in vitro and in cells reveal how sequence differences within this helix define the molecular basis for inhibition by Arpin vs. activation by NPFs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fregoso et al. (2021) studied this question. Arpin was evaluated on Cryo-EM structure and molecular mechanism of Arp2/3 complex inhibition. Cryo-EM structure at 3.24-Å resolution reveals that Arpin binds to the Arp3 site of the Arp2/3 complex, using sequence differences within its C-helix to inhibit rather than activate the complex.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: