Key result
This review outlines an algorithmic approach to acute venous thromboembolism treatment, incorporating direct oral anticoagulants and addressing situations where data are unavailable or insufficient.
Why the study?
How should acute venous thromboembolism be managed in-hospital and during follow-up, particularly with the integration of direct oral anticoagulants?
How should acute venous thromboembolism be managed in-hospital and during follow-up, particularly with the integration of direct oral anticoagulants?
This review provides an updated algorithmic approach to VTE management, highlighting the role of DOACs in acute treatment and secondary prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform acute VTE algorithms incorporating DOACs; leaves open management where evidence remains insufficient.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality of particular relevance for intensivists and hospitalists. Acute VTE is usually managed with parenteral unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by an oral vitamin K antagonist. Data are lacking for optimal treatment of less common occurrences, such as upper extremity DVT, and for approaches such as thrombolysis for PE associated with early signs of hemodynamic compromise or inferior vena cava filters when anticoagulation is contraindicated. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are now added to the armamentarium of agents available for acute management of VTE and/or reducing the risk of recurrence. This review outlines an algorithmic approach to acute VTE treatment: from aggressive therapies when anticoagulation may be inadequate, to alternative choices when anticoagulation is contraindicated, to anticoagulant options in the majority of patients in whom anticoagulation is appropriate. Evidence-based guidelines and the most recent DOAC clinical trial data are discussed in the context of the standard of care. Situations and treatment approaches for which data are unavailable or insufficient are identified. VTE therapy in care transitions is discussed, as are choices for secondary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenchus et al. (2016) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism (VTE). Venous thromboembolism treatments including DOACs was evaluated. This review outlines an algorithmic approach to acute venous thromboembolism treatment, incorporating direct oral anticoagulants and addressing situations where data are unavailable or insufficient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: