Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A set A not in P is polynomially levelable if any algorithm for A has speedup to a polynomial infinitely often in A: precisely, if given any algorithm M for A and polynomial p, it is possible to find another algorithm $M'$ for A and polynomial $p'$, such that $M'$ runs in time $p'(|x|)$ on infinitely many inputs x in A, on which the running time of M exceeds $p(|x|)$. Intuitively, this condition states that among polynomial time computable approximations to A there is no optimal one, or one giving correct answers on a maximally large subset of A. It appears that most naturally occurring intractable sets are polynomially levelable. We prove this for sets not in P that are either “paddable,” “self-reducible,” or complete for a deterministic time class. We also discuss levelability preserving reductions, and give a simple reducibility characterization of nonlevelable sets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orponen et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: