Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We discuss the relation of a variety of different methods to determine energy levels in lattice QCD simulations: the generalised eigenvalue, the Prony, the generalised pencil of function and the Gardner methods. All three former methods can be understood as special cases of a generalised eigenvalue problem. We show analytically that the leading corrections to an energy Eₗ E l in all three methods due to unresolved states decay asymptotically exponentially like exp (-(Eₙ-Eₗ)t) exp ( - ( E n - E l ) t ) . Using synthetic data we show that these corrections behave as expected also in practice. We propose a novel combination of the generalised eigenvalue and the Prony method, denoted as GEVM/PGEVM, which helps to increase the energy gap Eₙ-Eₗ E n - E l . We illustrate its usage and performance using lattice QCD examples. The Gardner method on the other hand is found less applicable to realistic noisy data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: