Key result
Future trials of neuroprotective therapy in acute stroke require simple, practicable designs and tens of thousands of patients to reliably detect moderate clinical benefits.
Highlights the necessity for large-scale, simple, and practicable clinical trial designs to reliably detect moderate benefits of neuroprotective therapies in acute stroke.
Neuroprotective agents should not enter routine acute stroke care; leaves open moderate benefits pending large simple trials.
Any therapeutic trial of a new treatment for stroke must provide sufficient reliable evidence to convince clinicians and healthcare purchasers of its merits. Clinicians are most likely to be convinced by large independent studies that provide clear evidence of benefit. If the trial is really to alter healthcare delivery, it should also confirm that the treatment is cost-effective enough to satisfy the increasingly critical demands of the healthcare purchasers. Although some of the current trials will be able to detect large benefits, reliable detection of the moderate benefits that seem more plausible with neuroprotection will need to wait until completion of trials that are perhaps an order of magnitude larger. If tens of thousands of patients are to be recruited into trials of neuroprotective therapy, it is essential that the trials have simple practicable designs that allow participation not only by interested university hospitals but also busy general hospitals with few research resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorman et al. (1996) conducted a review in Acute Stroke. Neuroprotective therapy was evaluated. Future trials of neuroprotective therapy in acute stroke require simple, practicable designs and tens of thousands of patients to reliably detect moderate clinical benefits.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: