Relative Permeability Hysteresis: Trapping Models and Application to Geological CO2 Sequestration E. J. Spiteri; E. J. Spiteri Stanford U. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar R. Juanes; R. Juanes Stanford U. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar M. J. Blunt; M. J. Blunt Imperial College Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar F. M. Orr F. M. Orr Stanford U. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2005. Paper Number: SPE-96448-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/96448-MS Published: October 09 2005 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Spiteri, E. J., Juanes, R., Blunt, M. J., and F. M. Orr. "Relative Permeability Hysteresis: Trapping Models and Application to Geological CO2 Sequestration." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/96448-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search Abstract The complex physics of multiphase flow in porous media are usually modeled at the field scale using Darcy-type formulations. The key descriptors of such models are the relative permeabilities to each of the flowing phases. It is well known that, whenever the fluid saturations undergo a cyclic process, relative permeabilities display hysteresis effects.In this paper we investigate hysteresis in the relative permeability of the hydrocarbon phase in a two-phase system. We propose a new model of trapping and waterflood relative permeability, which is applicable for the entire range of rock wettability conditions. The proposed formulation overcomes some of the limitations of existing trapping and relative permeability models. The new model is validated by means of pore-network simulation of primary drainage and waterflooding. We study the dependence of trapped (residual) hydrocarbon saturation and waterflood relative permeability on several fluid/rock properties, most notably the wettability and the initial water saturation.The relevance of relative permeability hysteresis is then evaluated for modeling geological CO2 sequestration processes. Here we concentrate on CO2 injection in saline aquifers. In this setting, the CO2 is the nonwetting phase, and trapping of the CO2 is an essential mechanism after the injection phase, during the lateral and upward migration of the CO2 plume. We demonstrate the importance of accounting for CO2 trapping in the relative permeability model for predicting the distribution and mobility of CO2 in the formation. We conclude that a proper treatment of the nonwetting phase trapping leads to a higher estimate of the amount of CO2 that it is safe to inject. Keywords: relative permeability curve, contact angle, relative permeability, upstream oil & gas, hysteresis, saturation, permeability, oil saturation, mechanism, oil-wet media Subjects: Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Flow in porous media Copyright 2005, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spiteri et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: