Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores the role of principal stratification in assessing causal effects, highlighting its benefits and limitations.
Pearl (2011) asked for the causal inference community to clarify the role of the principal stratification framework in the analysis of causal effects. Here, I argue that the notion of principal stratification has shed light on problems of non-compliance, censoring-by-death, and the analysis of post-infection outcomes; that it may be of use in considering problems of surrogacy but further development is needed; that it is of some use in assessing "direct effects"; but that it is not the appropriate tool for assessing "mediation." There is nothing within the principal stratification framework that corresponds to a measure of an "indirect" or "mediated" effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyler J. VanderWeele (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: