This theoretical integration o f social psycho logy's main cognitive and affect ive constructs was shaped by three influences: (a) recent widespread interest in automatic and implicit cognition, (b) development of the Implicit Association Test (IAT: Greenwa ld, McGhee, & Schwar tz, 1998) , and (c) social psychology's consist ency theo ries of t he 1950s -especially Heider's (1958) balance theory.The balanced identity design is introduced as a method to test correlational predictions of the theory.Data obtained with this method revealed that predicted consistency patterns we re strong ly appare nt in the dat a for implicit (IAT) measures, but not in those for parallel explicit (self-report) measures.Two additional not-yet-tested predictions of the theory are described. The Cognitive Consistency Theoretical TraditionTheories of cognitive consistency dominated social psychology in the 1960s.The most influential ones had appeared in t he 1950 s, in clud ing Osgo od and Tannenbaum's ( 195 5) congr uit y the or y, Festinger's (1957 ) co gnit ive disso nanc e theo ry, and Heider's (1958) balance theory.The high point of consistency theory was the 1968 publication of the 6-editor, 920-page handbook, Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook (Abelson, Aronson, McGuire, Newcomb, Rosenberg, & Tannenba um, 1968) ; it cont ained 84 chapters by 75 co ntribut ing authors.Now, just over thirty years later, it is remarkable that these once-do minant theories receive at most occasional mention by social psychologists.There are several ways to understand this fall from favor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenwald et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: