BackgroundThe aim of this systematic review is to investigate the available literature on the biomechanical characteristics of the acromioclavicular joint to identify trends in translational parameters and contributions of the various ligamentous structures supporting the joint.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases until October 2023 to identify articles reporting on the biomechanical characteristics of the acromioclavicular joint. Non cadaveric or projects involving reconstruction were excluded. Consistent parameters evaluated were anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior translation. The data was extracted from the included articles and summarized.Results11 biomechanical papers were reviewed from six different countries — United States (n=6), France (n=1), Austria (n=1), Thailand (n=1), United Kingdom (n=1), and Japan (n=1). The total number of specimens included across the reviewed papers was 141. All 11 papers reported the data on an intact model (CC and AC ligaments intact). Seven papers assessed the translational results of the AC sectioned condition, finding a greater increase in AP laxity relative to SI. 3 papers evaluated CC ligament sectioning, finding increased SI laxity relative to AP. Only one study involved ligament sectioning isolating the anterior-inferior bundle of the AC joint.ConclusionThis review highlights the key anterior-posterior and superior-inferior constraints of both the intact and ligament sectioned AC joint. The inconsistency of AC joint testing parameters and the lack of thorough translation studies indicates a necessity for increased attention in the overall assessment of shoulder stability to close the gap in the foundational biomechanical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fraipont et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: