Major League Baseball, is a business. As such, professional baseball teams are anxious to improve the nature of the product for profit enhancement purposes. As early as 1928 the use of a designated hitter (DH) had been suggested as a product improvement. [Dewtsch et. al. p. 130] Under the DH rule adopted by the American League in 1973, a team is allowed to designate a player who will bat in place of one of the nine players in the lineup. The DH does not play in the field; his contribution is limited to offense only. The optimum strategy is for the DH to bat in place of the weakest hitter in the line-up, typically the pitcher. It should be apparent that the use of a DH will increase the amount of runs scored in a game because of the substitution of a relatively strong hitter for a relatively weak one. This latter point is readily conceded by both proponents and opponents to the rule. If increasing the amount of offense in a baseball game is a genuine product improvement, then demand should increase and revenues should be enhanced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domazlicky et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: