Why the study?
It remained unknown whether aldosterone-induced cardiac electrical and structural remodeling modulates the efficacy of anti-AF drugs.
Does aldosterone-induced remodeling modulate the electrophysiological response to acehytisine in rats with aorto-venocaval shunts?
Does aldosterone-induced remodeling modulate the electrophysiological response to acehytisine in rats with aorto-venocaval shunts?
In a rat model of heart failure, aldosterone-induced remodeling blunted the anti-atrial fibrillation efficacy of acehytisine.
Aldosterone remodeling may blunt acehytisine efficacy in HF-related AF; hypothesis-generating for clinical translation.
Aldosterone induces cardiac electrical and structural remodeling, which leads to the development of heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unknown whether aldosterone-induced remodeling may modulate the efficacy of anti-AF drugs. In this study, we aimed to jeopardize the structural and functional remodeling by aldosterone in rats with aorto-venocaval shunts (AVS rats) and evaluate the effect of acehytisine in this model. An AVS operation was performed on rats (n = 6, male) and it was accompanied by the intraperitoneal infusion of aldosterone (AVS + Ald) at 2.0 µg/h for 28 d. The cardiopathy was characterized by echocardiography, electrophysiologic and hemodynamic testing, and morphometric examination in comparison with sham-operated rats (n = 3), sham + Ald (n = 6), and AVS (n = 5). Aldosterone accelerated the progression from asymptomatic heart failure to overt heart failure and induced sustained AF resistant to electrical fibrillation in one out of six rats. In addition, it prolonged PR, QT interval and Wenckebach cycle length. Acehytisine failed to suppress AF in the AVS + Ald rats. In conclusion, aldosterone jeopardized electrical remodeling and blunted the electrophysiological response to acehytisine on AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: