Exploratory research investigates motivation and anxiety in Chinese graduate students, highlighting measurement challenges in cross-cultural contexts.
This study investigated the relationship between motivation and anxiety among Chinese graduate students ( N = 300) studying in the Philippines in the post-pandemic era, a distinctive Southeast Asian English-medium instruction context, using adapted versions of the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) and the Attitude/Motivation Test Battery (AMTB). The descriptive results show that both integrative motivation and instrumental motivation are high. Doctoral students are a little more motivated and a little less anxious than master's students. Nonetheless, discriminant validity assessments employing the HTMT criteria indicated that integrative motivation and fear of negative evaluations (HTMT=0.94), along with instrumental motivation and test anxiety (HTMT=0.91), cannot be empirically differentiated. These results show that there is a lot of conceptual overlap and measurement contamination. Consequently, the significant correlation observed between motivation and anxiety (ranging from 0.66 to 0.90) cannot be interpreted as indicative of a robust relationship between distinct psychological constructs. Because of this, this study should be seen as exploratory research. Its main contribution is in terms of method: it shows that you need to be careful when using Western-developed scales with Chinese students in cross-border educational settings, and it stresses how important it is to do strict discriminant validity tests. Be careful when interpreting the results of cross-cultural second language acquisition research that uses existing scales before making tools for cultural adaptation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hailong Li (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: