Examines classifiers in Dunhuang manuscripts, revealing differing semantic functions in Chinese syntax.
In addition to examining the eight classifiers and the noun phrases constructed from the classifiers in the Dunhuang manuscripts of the Tang-Five Dynasties period, this study shall point to the division of these eight classifiers into two types. The first type is the “initially-dominant,” generally ordered as “numeral +classifier+noun,” with the classifier preceding the noun. The second is the “following-dominant” type, which is generally ordered as “noun+ numeral+classifier,” with the classifier following the noun. The study will show that the two types had different functions; the former served to assign the noun a particular “form” or “attribute,” while the latter type did not have this function. It was because the noun phrase ordered as “numeral+classifier+noun,” produced the syntactic meaning of high “individuality” that the former generally preceded the noun.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takashi Matsue (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: