Key result
Multidisciplinary remote cardiac rehab with continuous wearable monitoring drives strong preference among CABG patients.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation uptake among CABG patients in China is extremely low, and designing remote cardiac rehabilitation requires quantifying patient preferences and willingness to pay to ensure adoption.
What are the preferences and willingness-to-pay for remote cardiac rehabilitation attributes among CABG patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=343)
What are the preferences and willingness-to-pay for remote cardiac rehabilitation attributes among CABG patients?
CABG patients prioritize professional, multidisciplinary team-led remote cardiac rehabilitation with continuous wearable monitoring and video content.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide remote cardiac rehabilitation design; hypothesis-generating pending trials on adherence and outcomes.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) uptake among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients in China is extremely low. Remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) offers a promising alternative, but its design must be informed by patient’s preferences to ensure adoption. This study aimed to quantify CABG patients’ preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for key RCR attributes to inform patient-centered service design. A discrete choice experiment was administered to CABG patients, assessing preferences across six RCR attributes: service content, service provider, degree of personalization, monitoring method, content model, and cost. Data were analyzed using a mixed logit model to estimate preferences, WTP, and relative importance (RI). Subgroup analyses by gender and age were performed. A total of 343 CABG patients participated in the study, of whom 69.39% were male, with a mean age of 61.69 (SD = 10.33) years. Within the present DCE model, service provider emerged as the most critical attribute (RI = 45.54). Patients strongly preferred services led by multidisciplinary teams ( β = 1.70 *** , WTP = CNY 92.65/month), followed by doctor-led services ( β = 1.09 *** , WTP = CNY 59.21/month). Continuous automatic monitoring via wearable devices ( β = 0.90 *** , WTP = CNY 49.32/month) was also highly valued. Personalized plans based on discharge assessment were preferred over standardized fixed protocols ( β = 0.36 * , WTP = CNY 19.50/month). Cost had a significant negative impact on choice (RI = 8.21; β =-0.02 ** ). Video content was preferred over text ( β = 0.52 *** , WTP = CNY 28.33/month), while voice format showed no significant effect. In this subgroup analysis, male patients showed significant preferences for a wider range of attributes, whereas female patients showed significant preferences primarily for service provider. Younger patients (≤ 60 years) also favored personalized based on discharge assessment, while older patients (> 60 years) preferred AI assistant + regular review by team members and comprehensive programs. CABG patients prioritize professional, integrated support and convenient technology in RCR. Program development should emphasize multidisciplinary teams, wearable devices, and video content. These patient-informed strategies are essential to enhance engagement and address the low CR uptake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=343). Remote cardiac rehabilitation attributes was evaluated on Preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for key RCR attributes. CABG patients strongly preferred remote cardiac rehabilitation services led by multidisciplinary teams (β=1.70, WTP=CNY 92.65/month) and continuous automatic monitoring via wearable devices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: