ML-Net outperformed comparable schemes in diagnosing myocardial infarction using ECG data, requiring lower computational cost and less memory for portable devices.
Does ML-Net improve the detection of myocardial infarction from ECG data compared to traditional models while reducing computational and memory requirements?
The proposed ML-Net model offers an accurate and resource-efficient solution for real-time myocardial infarction detection on portable devices.
Due to the complexity of myocardial infarction (MI) waveform, most traditional automatic diagnosis models rarely detect it, while those able to detect MI often require high computing and storage capacity, rendering them unsuitable for portable devices. Therefore, in order for convenient real-time MI detection, it is essential to design lightweight models suitable for resource-limited portable devices. This paper proposes a novel multi-channel lightweight model (ML-Net), that provides a new solution for portable detection devices with limited resources. In ML-Net, each electrocardiogram (ECG) lead is assigned an independent channel, ensuring data independence and preserve the ECG characteristics of different angles represented by different leads. Moreover, convolution kernels of heterogeneous sizes are utilized to achieve accurate classification with only a small amount of lead data. Extensive experiments over actual ECG data from the PTB diagnostic database are conducted to evaluate ML-Net. The results show that ML-Net outperforms comparable schemes in diagnosing MI, and it requires lower computational cost and less memory, so that portable devices can be more widely used in the field of Internet of Medical Things(IoMT).
Cao et al. (Sat,) conducted a other in Myocardial Infarction. ML-Net (Multi-Channel Lightweight Network) vs. comparable schemes was evaluated on Diagnosing myocardial infarction. ML-Net outperformed comparable schemes in diagnosing myocardial infarction using ECG data, requiring lower computational cost and less memory for portable devices.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: