Demonstrates improved arsenate removal from water using a functional membrane, suggesting effective environmental applications.
In this study, a functional surface coating composed of Fe-Mn binary oxide (FM) and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS, PP) was applied to a PVDF membrane (PP-FM-PVDF) for efficient arsenate (As(V)) removal. PP acts as a dispersant and hydrophilic modifier, ensuring uniform FM distribution and reducing the water contact angle to 50.1°. The PP-FM-PVDF membrane achieves a maximum As(V) adsorption capacity of 30.43 mg/g, outperforming pristine and singly modified membranes. The batch adsorption data fit the Langmuir isotherm (R2 = 0.999) and pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.99), indicating monolayer chemisorption. The coating increases the specific surface area to 27.33 m2/g and the tensile strength to 6.41 MPa. Dynamic filtration shows that 2.70 L (2149.7 L/m2) of 100 μg/L As(V) solution can be treated before the permeate concentration exceeds the WHO guideline of 10 μg/L. After alkaline regeneration (pH 11), 62.9% of the initial capacity is retained. Complementary surface-sensitive analyses (zeta potential, XPS, and EXAFS) reveal that arsenate adsorption occurs primarily through ligand exchange between arsenate oxyanions and Fe/Mn surface hydroxyl groups on the coating, forming inner-sphere bidentate complexes (Fe–O–As and Mn–O–As), while electrostatic interactions play a secondary, pH-dependent role. This surface engineering strategy—synergistically integrating a conductive hydrophilic polymer with a metal oxide as a functional coating on PVDF—offers a reusable, high-performance platform for arsenate remediation, underscoring the critical role of interface design in environmental membrane applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: