Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates local anti-inflammatory effects in lung transplantation, suggesting improved outcomes.
Background: Cyclosporine is widely used to prevent transplant rejection; however, its systemic administration is associated with low bioavailability and a risk of severe adverse side effects. In the context of lung transplantation, local pulmonary delivery represents a promising strategy to reduce the required dose while enhancing local anti-inflammatory efficacy and limiting systemic toxicity. Methods: In this study, cyclosporine was encapsulated in liposomes coated with calcium phosphate to improve cellular uptake. The liposomal formulation was subsequently converted into a dry powder for inhalation to enable pulmonary administration, combining cyclosporine-loaded liposomes with a calcium phosphate coating, extending prior work on inhaled liposomal cyclosporine and mineral-coated liposomes into a single platform. The cyclosporine loading was optimised to achieve an efficient drug content in the final formulation. Results: The presence of the calcium phosphate coating on the liposomal surface was confirmed by the shift in zeta potential and by cryo-transmission electron microscopy. The resulting dry powder exhibited suitable aerodynamic properties for pulmonary delivery with a fine particle fraction of 33.6 ± 1.6%. In vitro biocompatibility studies performed on A549 epithelial cells and THP-1 monocytic cells demonstrated that the formulation did not affect cell viability. Furthermore, the formulation containing calcium phosphate-coated liposomes showed a stronger anti-inflammatory effect compared with both uncoated liposomal formulations and the corresponding raw material, consisting of a physical mixture of phospholipids and cyclosporine. Conclusions: Overall, despite limitations on respirability and efficacy that will require further in vivo studies, this calcium phosphate-coated liposomal dry powder could represent a promising strategy for targeted pulmonary delivery of cyclosporine, with potential to improve the prevention of lung transplant rejection while minimising systemic side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Angelo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: