Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores design principles to improve CO2 capture from air, highlighting energy efficiency implications.
Direct air capture (DAC) using solid sorbents is limited by energy demand and productivity, which depend strongly on adsorbent properties. Cooperative adsorbents with step-shaped isotherms are promising for capturing CO 2 from ultra-dilute air, but the link between isotherm characteristics and process performance remains unclear. This work couples a validated packed-bed temperature–vacuum swing adsorption (TVSA) model with an artificial neural network (ANN) surrogate to explore the multi-dimensional design space of cooperative sorbents, using mmen–Mg 2 (dobpdc) as a benchmark. The surrogate model is trained on 2866 simulation data points to enable efficient sensitivity analysis and optimisation. Results reveal a clear hierarchy of control: step pressure (P step0 ), step enthalpy (ΔH step ), and high-loading enthalpy (ΔH High ) dominate specific energy consumption (SEC), productivity, and purity, whereas kinetics show minor influence under the studied regime. Significant second-order interactions were identified between P step0 and ΔH step , highlighting the coupled role of step position and energetics. Surrogate-assisted design exploration identifies an optimal design region, characterised by low step pressure, moderate step enthalpy, and high adsorption capacity. A representative optimal isotherm improves CO 2 recovery from 53% to 76% and increases productivity by approximately 38%, while reducing energy consumption to 2.9 MJ/kg CO 2 at ∼98% purity. These improvements arise from aligning the adsorption step with the DAC operating window while maintaining favourable adsorption energetics. Importantly, these findings establish process-informed design principles, enabling targeted tuning of material properties for improved DAC performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: