Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study analyzes the measurement properties of the Brazilian KJOC questionnaire in athletes with shoulder pain, indicating its reliability and validity.
Context The Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic (KJOC) questionnaire is a well-established tool used in several countries; however, the measurement properties of the Brazilian version (KJOC/Br) have not yet been analyzed. This cross-sectional study aimed to analyze the measurement properties of the KJOC/Br. Methods We included overhead athletes (18 to 60 years) with shoulder pain, ≥ 2 training sessions per week, and ≥ 1 year of competitive experience. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. Construct validity was examined through correlations between the KJOC/Br and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH). Results The KJOC/Br demonstrated adequate internal consistency and moderate correlations with the NPRS (r = −0.53), PSFS (r = 0.56), QuickDASH (r = −0.50), ASES (r = 0.42), and the QuickDASH Sports Module (r = −0.58). In addition, it demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC > 0.90), with a standard error of measurement of 5.05 and an Minimal Detectable Change 90 of 11.72 . Conclusion The Brazilian version of the KJOC demonstrated excellent reliability and adequate internal consistency and construct validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: