Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis explores judicial activism regarding socio-economic rights under Article 21, suggesting a fundamental right to livelihood.
The Indian Constitution's Article 21 enshrines the right to life and personal liberty, yet remains conspicuously silent on explicit socio-economic entitlements such as the right to livelihood. Through progressive judicial activism, the Supreme Court has filled these constitutional silences by expansively interpreting
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dr.Sipala Siva Kumar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: