Retrospective cohort study analyzes Oocyte Maturation Index's impact on pregnancy outcomes in POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4, indicating its significance.
This study A total of 662 patients treated at the Assisted Reproductive Techniques Unit of Mersin University Faculty of Medicine between 2016 and 2024 (Group 3: n=245; Group 4: n=417) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three subgroups based on OMI values: ≤50%, 51–75%, and >75%. In both POSEIDON groups, the numbers of aspirated follicles, retrieved oocytes, MII oocytes, and high-quality day-3 embryos showed significant differences between OMI groups (p<0.001). In POSEIDON Group 3, patients with an OMI of 51–75% achieved the highest rates of biobiochemical pregnancy (43.9%), clinical pregnancy (42.1%), and live birth (35.1%), while these rates were lowest in the group with an OMI of ≤50% (10.9%, 10.9%, and 5.5%, respectively; p=0.001). In POSEIDON Group 4, while OMI significantly influenced chemical ( p =0.005) and clinical pregnancy ( p =0.014) rates, it did not result in a statistically significant difference in live birth rates ( p =0.056). OMI is a clinically significant prognostic parameter, particularly for younger patients in the POSEIDON Group 3. In older patients (Group 4), however, age-related oocyte proglems my controbite the decisive effect of OMI on live birth. Incorporating OMI into routine clinical evaluations may contribute to personalized treatment planning and patient counseling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bayram et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: