Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory study evaluates a biomimetic toilet seat to improve movement in older adults, indicating potential benefits for functional independence.
Many older residential toilet designs may pose substantial biomechanical demands for older adults with reduced lower-extremity strength, as standard seat heights often require increased joint range of motion (ROM) and compensatory upper-limb support during sit-to-stand (STS) transfer. This exploratory, repeated-measures biomechanical study evaluated the effects of a biomimetic Stand-assist Toilet Seat (BSTS) designed to facilitate STS movement through a forward-and-upward curvilinear lifting trajectory. Thirty community-dwelling older adults were stratified into high-, moderate-, and low-functioning groups according to normative 30 s Chair Stand Test performance. Participants completed repeated STS trials under conventional and BSTS-assisted seating conditions in randomized order. A synchronized multimodal assessment integrating MediaPipe Pose-based motion tracking for sagittal-plane kinematic analysis was used to quantify lower-limb kinematics and upper-limb kinetics. Mixed-design ANOVA revealed significant main effects of seating condition on hip and knee ROM (all p < 0.001, η2p > 0.70), indicating reduced lower-limb joint motion requirements under the BSTS condition. Significant reductions were also observed in peak arm-support force (F (1,27) = 14.57, p = 0.001, η2p = 0.35) and arm-support impulse (F (1,27) = 20.21, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.42), demonstrating decreased upper-limb loading during STS transfer. No significant interaction effects between seating condition and functional group were identified. These findings suggest that the BSTS modified STS movement patterns and reduced upper-limb loading demands in community-dwelling older adults. The combined kinematic and kinetic assessment approach may provide a practical method for biomechanical evaluation of assistive seating technologies in rehabilitation and aging-related applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: