Comparative analysis reveals differences in nutraceutical perceptions between Arabic-speaking and international consumers, suggesting tailored marketing strategies.
This study extends a four-paper series on nutraceutical consumer behaviour in the MENA region by comparing formulation preferences, purchase behaviour, safety perceptions, and price sensitivity across Jordanian, other Arabic-speaking, and non-Arabic-speaking consumers (n = 1,000). A central methodological contribution is the demonstration that cultural group and survey language are deeply confounded in cross-cultural health-consumer research: uncontrolled models produced both false positive and false negative cultural group effects within the same dataset. After controlling for survey language, attitudinal outcomes — including price sensitivity, herbal safety endorsement, and certification importance — generalised across the Arabic-speaking world, while formulation preference and purchase channel were Jordan-specific. The gender effect on supplement choice was cross-culturally homogeneous. Nutraceutical awareness was invariant across all groups. Findings inform both pan-Arabic and market-localised positioning strategies, and the sequential modelling framework proposed here offers a practical template for multilingual cross-cultural survey research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anfal Rababah (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: