Study integrates wound images and clinical text for better pressure injury management, suggesting enhanced treatment decisions.
Pressure injury management requires coordinated decisions on wound staging, debridement, and dressing selection, yet most computational studies focus on isolated tasks using a single data modality. This study developed a multimodal, multi-task framework integrating wound photographs and clinical text to support pressure injury stage classification, debridement necessity prediction, primary dressing recommendation, and secondary dressing recommendation. Models were trained on an expert-annotated public dataset and externally validated using an independent private cohort. We systematically compared image-only models, text-only models, large language model-based approaches, conventional image–text fusion strategies, and image–language model combinations. Among the evaluated models, ResNet-50 combined with DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B showed the best overall balance across classification performance, text-generation quality, and validation robustness. On the validation set, the final model achieved 82.92% accuracy, 81.26% macro-F1, and 99.01% area under the curve for stage classification, and 89.91% accuracy, 89.83% macro-F1, and 96.24% area under the curve for debridement prediction. For dressing recommendation, the model achieved ROUGE-1 scores of 58.30% and 61.06% for primary and secondary dressings, respectively. Interpretability analyses indicated clinically relevant image attention and text attribution patterns. These findings suggest that multimodal learning may provide a clinically aligned decision-support approach for pressure injury assessment and treatment recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: