PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026Bratislavské lekárske listy/Bratislava medical journal0 citationsOpen Access

Resolving Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements and Rare Structural Variants: An Integrated Cytogenomic Analysis of Four Cases

SKSinem KocagilSASabri AynacıEGEbru Erzurumluoğlu Gökalp

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the effectiveness of an integrated cytogenomic approach for diagnosing rare structural variants and complex chromosomal rearrangements.
  • Retrospective case series of 7508 individuals analyzed at a tertiary genetic center.
  • Integration of karyotyping, FISH, CMA, and Optical Genome Mapping for case resolution.
  • Focus on four cases where standard testing failed to identify genomic variants.
  • Four complex genomic variants were identified that standard diagnostic approaches could not resolve.
  • A chromoanagenesis-related ring 18 and a rare ATAD3 deletion were among the detected variants.
  • Intrachromosomal rearrangements and an incidental sex chromosomal rearrangement were also characterized.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Structural variants (SVs) are genomic rearrangements ≥ 50 bp that alter copy number, orientation, or chromosomal location, and complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) represent a rare SV subset characterized by three or more chromosomal breakpoints, often involving multiple chromosomes. Aim of the study To evaluate the diagnostic utility of an integrated cytogenomic workflow in characterizing rare SVs and CCRs within a tertiary genetic center cohort. Results In this study, a retrospective case series from a diagnostic cohort of 7508 individuals who applied to our center were reviewed. We identified four cases where standard single-modality testing was insufficient. The integration of karyotyping, FISH, CMA, and Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) allowed for the step-by-step resolution of complex puzzles, including a possible chromoanagenesis-related ring 18, a technically elusive ATAD3 deletion, an intrachromosomal CCR and one with a rare sex chromosomal rearrangement detected incidentally. Conclusion All four patients presented with genomic variants that could not be fully resolved using a single routine diagnostic approach. The integrated use of cytogenetics technologies remains essential for the accurate diagnosis and interpretation of complex genomic variation in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kocagil et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2269c9763171746d5484fehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44411-026-00684-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper