Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved detection of depression through innovative multimodal techniques, suggesting better diagnostic accuracy.
Multimodal depression detection aims to identify depressive states by integrating complementary affective cues from audio, visual, and textual modalities. However, existing approaches often directly fuse multimodal features, which may introduce semantic interference, information redundancy, and insufficiently discriminative representations. To address these issues, this paper proposes a multimodal depression detection model based on modality feature decomposition and contrastive learning (MFDCL). Specifically, unimodal representations are decomposed into modality-shared and modality-specific features to distinguish cross-modal affective consistency from modality-dependent characteristics. Subsequently, sample-to-sample contrastive learning is applied within the shared feature space, where label-guided positive and negative sample pairs are constructed to enhance the discriminability between depressed and non-depressed states. In addition, a lightweight multi-scale attention fusion module is introduced to capture affective cues across different receptive fields. Experimental results on the DAIC-WOZ and E-DAIC datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. On DAIC-WOZ, MFDCL achieves Precision, Recall, F1-score, and Accuracy of 0.92, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, while on E-DAIC, it achieves 0.95, 0.85, 0.90, and 0.97. These results indicate that MFDCL effectively enhances feature discriminability and achieves competitive performance in multimodal depression detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: