Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates high accuracy in detecting contaminants in pelleted seeds, indicating a safer testing method.
Seed coating improves agricultural handling and germination, but obscures visual identification and complicates quality control and regulatory compliance. Conventional de-coating is destructive, time-intensive and raises concerns about reliability and analyst safety. To compensate for these limitations, we introduce PelletRayTion , a non-destructive, automated alternative for contaminants detection in pelleted seeds using high-throughput tomography and unsupervised machine learning. Our fully unsupervised pipeline for contamination detection using β-VAE was trained exclusively on pure tomography data. This approach was evaluated on Beta vulgaris and Cichorium endivia , artificially contaminated with three other species, and reciprocally Cichorium endivia or Beta vulgaris . Our models reached sufficient generalisation with a data size of 800 volumes (64×64×64) for Beta vulgaris and 700 (64×64×64) for Cichorium endivia, using latent space dimensionality of 512 and 256, respectively. Across 1–50% contamination, they achieved balanced accuracy of 98.45 ± 0.95% ( Beta vulgaris ) and 97.47 ± 0.95% ( Cichorium endivia ), with 0% false negatives and low false alerts (3.10% − 5.06%). In conclusion, these results demonstrate that PelletRayTion provides a rapid, safe, and highly accurate alternative to conventional pelleted seed testing. This approach eliminated the need for massive annotated datasets while maintaining strong performance across different species and contaminants. It holds a significant potential for routine testing, biosecurity and regulatory workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamdy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: