The study analyzes relationships between socialization practices and identity. A special form of role construct repertory grid was applied to 2 groups of preadolescents who had experienced opposed socialization practices. Group 1 was raised within a “polyadic model” with several caregivers and multiple attachments, and Group 2 was raised within a “dyadic model” with a single caregiver who had privileged relationship with the child. Those in Group 1 were found to be more multidimensional and more inclined than those in Group 2 to construe themselves and others ambivalently. They also tended to identify with more people than those in Group 2, who identified with 1 or at most 2 people. Those in Group 1 tended to distinguish more clearly between “me as I am” and “me as others see me”. These results are discussed and interpreted as adaptation strategies for different social contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ugazio et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: