Key result
Increased epicardial fat linked to ~2% higher early arrhythmia recurrence per cm³ post-cryoballoon ablation.
Why the study?
The role of increased epicardial fat volume in predicting early outcomes after cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF remains incompletely defined.
Does increased epicardial fat volume predict early arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=61)
Does increased epicardial fat volume predict early arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Increased CT-derived epicardial fat volume is strongly associated with early atrial arrhythmia recurrence following cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF, offering excellent predictive performance.
Background Epicardial fat is a metabolically active visceral adipose tissue that has been implicated in atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation (AF) pathophysiology. Although increased epicardial fat volume has been associated with AF presence and recurrence after radiofrequency ablation, its role in predicting early outcomes after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) remains incompletely defined. This study aimed to evaluate the association between computed tomography (CT)–derived epicardial fat volume and early arrhythmia recurrence following CBA for paroxysmal AF. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 61 consecutive patients who underwent CBA for paroxysmal AF. Epicardial fat volume was quantified on pre-procedural non-contrast cardiac CT using automated segmentation with predefined attenuation thresholds (− 30 to − 190 HU). Patients were followed for 6 months after a 3-month blanking period. AF recurrence was defined as any documented atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting ≥ 30 s. Clinical, echocardiographic, laboratory, and procedural variables were compared between patients with and without recurrence. Univariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify predictors of recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed including age, body mass index, and epicardial fat volume. Results During follow-up, arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 14 patients (23.0%). Patients with recurrence were older and had higher rates of hypertension and coronary artery disease. Epicardial fat volume was significantly higher in patients with recurrence compared with those without recurrence (333.5 ± 82.1 vs. 201.2 ± 66.8 cm³, p < 0.001). In univariate logistic regression analysis, epicardial fat volume was a strong predictor of recurrence (OR 1.02 per cm³, 95% CI 1.01–1.04, p < 0.001), along with age, body mass index, left atrial diameter, coronary artery disease, and lower hemoglobin levels. ROC analysis demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability of epicardial fat volume for predicting recurrence (AUC = 0.891), outperforming body mass index (AUC = 0.836). No major procedural complications were observed. Conclusion Increased CT-derived epicardial fat volume is strongly associated with early atrial arrhythmia recurrence following cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF. Epicardial fat volume demonstrated excellent predictive performance and may provide incremental value beyond conventional clinical and echocardiographic parameters. Pre-procedural assessment of epicardial fat volume may help identify patients at higher risk for recurrence and guide individualized ablation strategies and follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uçar et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=61). Epicardial fat volume was evaluated on Early arrhythmia recurrence (atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardia lasting ≥ 30 s) (OR 1.02 per cm³, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, p=<0.001). Increased CT-derived epicardial fat volume was strongly associated with early atrial arrhythmia recurrence following cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF (OR 1.02 per cm³; 95% CI 1.01-1.04; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: