PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2009The Journal of Physical Chemistry B28 citationsOpen Access

Prediction of SAMPL-1 Hydration Free Energies Using a Continuum Electrostatics-Dispersion Model

TSTraian SuleaDWDuangporn WanapunSDSheldon Dennis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The SAMPL-1 hydration free energy blind prediction challenge data set includes 63 compounds that are more chemically diverse, polyfunctional, drug-like, and with examples of transfer free energies and molecular weights larger than ever before seen in previously tabulated data sets of neutral compounds. For the prospective SAMPL-1 study, we employed a continuum model including a boundary element solution of the Poisson equation to describe electrostatic solvation, a molecular surface area-based cost of cavity formation in water, and a continuum Lennard-Jones potential to account for dispersion-repulsion solute-solvent effects. For the latter contribution, continuum van der Waals atom-type coefficients were calibrated and validated on previously available hydration data sets. In the prospective study, this continuum hydration model yielded SAMPL-1 predictions highly correlated with experimental data, albeit with a slope of slightly above 0.5, suggesting a valid model but with a systematic error. Analysis of the major outliers, all overestimating the experimental hydration data, highlights a common structural theme as a possible cause of the prediction errors: densely polar and hydrogen-bond-capable structures, featuring primarily substituted (sulfon)amide groups, often in conjugated systems. By examining analog pairs within the SAMPL-1 data set, it was also noted that certain solvation trends are captured neither by chemical sense nor by our hydration model, which seem too additive. A retrospective analysis of model transferability between hydration data sets as a function of its parameters and complexity indicates that the electrostatic component of the model is fairly transferrable across data sets, but the nonelectrostatic terms are less so. For the chemical space covered in SAMPL-1, absolute prediction errors indicate that the simpler transferrable electrostatics-only model outperforms the more complex model including cavity and continuum dispersion terms. Possible directions to further improve this continuum hydration model are proposed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sulea et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a226f9afaaf5defc96ccb4dhttps://doi.org/10.1021/jp8061477
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules1995 · 13,201 citations
  2. 2Free energies of hydration of solute molecules. 2. Application of the hydration shell model to nonionic organic molecules1987 · 63 citations
  3. 3A Blind Challenge for Computational Solvation Free Energies: Introduction and Overview2009 · 222 citations
  4. 4Calculation of the interaction energy of one molecule with its whole surrounding. I. Method and application to pure nonpolar compounds1972 · 154 citations
  5. 5Solvation energy in protein folding and binding1986 · 1,882 citations