Key result
Mathematical adjustment of HRV by the average R-R interval had a nonsignificant effect on HRV reliability in healthy young men, though reliability varied by body position and index analyzed.
Why the study?
The reliability of heart rate variability analysis is not fully understood across different body positions and with the mathematical influence of heart rate.
Does mathematical adjustment of HRV by average R-R interval improve the reliability of HRV analysis in supine and standing positions in healthy young men?
Observational (n=37)
Does mathematical adjustment of HRV by average R-R interval improve the reliability of HRV analysis in supine and standing positions in healthy young men?
Mathematical adjustment of HRV by average R-R interval does not significantly affect HRV reliability in young men, though reliability varies by body position and specific index.
HRV adjustment by R-R interval is unnecessary for reliability in healthy young men; leaves open effects in clinical populations or other positions.
OBJECTIVE: The reliability of heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is not yet fully understood, especially considering different body positions and the mathematical influence of heart rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of HRV in supine and standing positions, with and without mathematical adjustment of HRV by the average R-R interval (iRR). METHODS: We evaluated 37 young males (23.1±4 years; 25.1±3 kg/m2). A 5-min segment of the iRR was collected in the supine and standing positions on three occasions separated by 48-hour intervals. Absolute and relative reliability of temporal and spectral indices were assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. RESULTS: We did not observe differences in HRV indices in the three occasions in the supine or standing position (p>0.05). Moderate to good reproducibility was observed for temporal and spectral indices of HRV in the supine position (ICC: 0.65-0.89; CV: 0.9-19.8). In the orthostatic position, low to good reproducibility was observed (ICC: 0.35-0.89; CV: 1.1-34.8), with higher ICCs for temporal indices. After mathematical adjustment, only a small modification in HRV reliability was observed in both positions. CONCLUSIONS: In young adult males, the mathematical adjustment of HRV by the average iRR led to a nonsignificant effect on HRV reliability. Additionally, HRV reliability is dependent on body position and the index analyzed. Promising measures in both supine and standing positions include r-MSSD and the HF band (parasympathetic indices).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruz et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=37). Mathematical adjustment of HRV by average R-R interval vs. Without mathematical adjustment was evaluated on Reliability of HRV indices (ICC and CV) (p=>0.05). Mathematical adjustment of HRV by the average R-R interval had a nonsignificant effect on HRV reliability in healthy young men, though reliability varied by body position and index analyzed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: