Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Reflective writing is a critical educational tool in medical training, promoting self-awareness, critical thinking, and professional growth. Peer review adds a collaborative dimension to reflective practices, enhancing depth and clarity through constructive feedback. However, challenges such as limited guidance, time constraints, and language barriers may hinder its effectiveness. This study evaluated the impact of peer-reviewed reflective writing on second-year medical students at Government Thoothukudi Medical College, India. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted with 30 second-year medical students enrolled in a Community Medicine block posting. Training sessions introduced students to Gibbs' Reflective Cycle and peer review principles using a standardized rubric. Students wrote initial reflections, participated in peer review, and revised their submissions based on feedback. Quantitative data from pre- and post-intervention surveys and rubric-based assessments of reflective writings were analyzed for improvements. Focus group discussions (FGDs) provided qualitative insights into students' experiences. RESULTS: Thirty students participated in the study. Quantitative analysis showed significant improvements in perceived value (3.2 ± 0.9 to 4.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) and confidence in reflective writing (2.8 ± 1.0 to 4.3 ± 0.8, p < 0.001). Reflective writing quality improved in clarity (3.1 ± 0.8 to 4.6 ± 0.5), depth (2.9 ± 1.0 to 4.4 ± 0.6), and adherence to Gibbs' Cycle (3.0 ± 0.7 to 4.7 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). FGDs revealed increased reflective depth, enhanced peer collaboration, and challenges such as language barriers and time constraints. CONCLUSION: Peer-reviewed reflective writing significantly enhances reflective practices, fostering critical thinking and professional growth. Addressing challenges, such as language barriers and variability in feedback quality, can further optimize outcomes. Integrating structured peer review into medical curricula can prepare students for reflective, collaborative clinical practice.
Annasekaran et al. (Thu,) studied this question.