Summary The bulk density, available water ( A ν ), air capacity ( C α ), and retained water capacity (θ ν ) were determined for 158 A, B, and C horizons of field soils. Clay (< 2 μm) and silt (2=60 μm) were also determined. Statistical analysis of the results demonstrated that bulk density exerts a profound influence on A ν , C α , and θ ν , but the effect varies between texture groups and horizons. Significant negative correlations were obtained between bulk density and C α for most texture and horizon groups. In B and C horizons A ν and θ ν also decrease with increasing density, whereas in A horizons A ν and θ ν tend to increase with bulk density except in silty soils. Within a limited range it is feasible to control these parameters by using field techniques to achieve optimum bulk density for particular soils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reeve et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: