PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 9, 2012Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres162 citationsOpen Access

Isotopic measurements of atmospheric methane in Los Angeles, California, USA: Influence of “fugitive” fossil fuel emissions

View Full Paper
ATAmy Townsend‐SmallSTStanley C. TylerDPDiane E. Pataki

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that CH 4 emissions in Los Angeles and other large cities may be underestimated. We utilized stable isotopes ( 13 C and D) and radiocarbon ( 14 C) to investigate sources of CH 4 in Los Angeles, California. First, we made measurements of δ 13 C and δ D of various CH 4 sources in urban areas. Fossil fuel CH 4 sources (oil refineries, power plants, traffic, and oil drilling fields) had δ 13 C values between −45 and −30‰ and dD values between −275 and −100‰, whereas biological CH 4 (cows, biofuels, landfills, sewage treatment plants, and cattle feedlots) had δ 13 C values between −65 and −45‰ and δ D values between −350 and −275‰. We made high‐altitude observations of CH 4 concentration using continuous tunable laser spectroscopy measurements combined with isotope analyses ( 13 C, 14 C, and D) of discrete samples to constrain urban CH 4 sources. Our data indicate that the dominant source of CH 4 in Los Angeles has a δ 13 C value of approximately −41.5‰ and a δ D value between −229 and −208‰. Δ 14 C of CH 4 in urban air samples ranged from +262 to +344‰ (127.1 to 134.9 pMC), depleted with respect to average global background CH 4 . We conclude that the major source of CH 4 in Los Angeles is leakage of fossil fuels, such as from geologic formations, natural gas pipelines, oil refining, and/or power plants. More research is needed to constrain fluxes of CH 4 from natural gas distribution and refining, as this flux may increase with greater reliance on natural gas and biogas for energy needs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Townsend‐Small et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2287d23e33ec07c66cca35https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016826
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper