Review: Protecting the Commons: A Framework for Resource Management in the Americas By J. Burger et al. Reviewed by Elery Hamilton-Smith Charles Sturt University, Australia J. Burger, E. Ostrom, R. B. Norgaard, D. Policansky, & B. D. Goldstein. Protecting the Commons: A Framework for Resource Management in the Americas. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2001. 360 pp. ISBN 1-55963-738-2 (paperback). US$30.00 When Garratt Hardin published The Tragedy of the Commons in 1968, it was, at first, perceived as a seminal statement of probably the central problem in environmental management. Further consideration showed that he had treated the troublesome issues of environmental management far too simplistically and his basic argument soon proved to be false. However, his work did lead to two truly valuable outcomes. The first is that he managed to penetrate the screen of complacent selfsatisfaction that had pervaded the thinking of many public land managers. His book was one of what has become a plethora of critique and re-thinking of the assumptions underlying land management practice. The second was that he offered a new paradigm for thinking about common property as a phenomenon. This current book demonstrates the extent to which this paradigm has served to generate an immense amount of research and consideration. This book sets out on a very commendable path of endeavoring to review and assess the contemporary place of the commons paradigm. Some of its greatest value probably lies in the extent to which it demonstrates the applicability of the paradigm to the analysis of global (and other non-local) issues and to innovative applications such as issues of regional health and of medical services. After two useful introductory presentations, four essays discuss examples of the traditional application of the paradigm to local land resource issues. The next four essays deal with similar issues, but on a regional level, then three move to global issues of the atmosphere, the impact of world pollutants upon the Arctic region and medical care as a commons. Two further essays each examine emerging aspects of the politics and methodology that may lead in due course to greater effectiveness. This book has, not surprisingly, been put together by a group of true believers and so provides an excellent picture of the analytical strengths of the paradigm. One gains an immediate sense of optimism about and enthusiasm for the paradigm, even though some limitations and constraints are recognized. I can only commend it as an excellent overview of the current state-of-art in use of the paradigm and hence a very important book. Reading this book stimulated me and led me to question some aspects of the commons idea. The essay on medical care regrettably demonstrates the continuing simplism to which the paradigm has all too frequently been subjected. Discussing medical care from the experience of major and highly developed Western countries while neglecting both the influence of some of the major power brokers within the health services arena and the world-wide economic interdependence of health resources is doomed to provide only a partial and hence misleading analysis. …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elery Hamilton‐Smith (2002) studied this question.