Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Numerous methods for the determination of soil sulphur (S) have been developed and tested in field conditions, but so far none of them have shown a satisfying relationship to crop yield. Therefore, these methods are not suitable to be used to evaluate the sulphur supply or to determine the sulphur fertilizer demand. In this paper a successful approach was adapted and optimized for routine analysis in soils in humid conditions. Modifications included a comparison of soil incubation with shaking, changes in the concentration of the extractant, the soil-to-extractant ratio, the time of shaking, particle size of the soil and method of detection. The best results in terms of a high reproducibility and sensitivity of the method for soils with extremely low, but also high, sulphur contents were obtained when the soil was extracted in a 1:5 ratio with 0.025 M KCl, shaken for 3 hr and then filtered. The method is suitable for ICP and IC measurement, whereby IC is preferable on low sulphur soils because of the higher detection limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bloem et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: